Tuesday, July 15, 2014

GONE BABY GONE


           By the time Gigli came along, Ben Affleck’s days as a new Hollywood wonder boy were a distant memory. Gigli was just the coup de grรขce, Armageddon, Forces of Nature, Reindeer Games, Pearl Harbor, and a tabloid romance with Jennifer Lopez had already dealt deathly blows. Was this the same young man who had made a promising start not long before with Good Will Hunting? And the over-the-top morbidity of Smokin’ Aces was yet to come!
            Soon after, however, Affleck did what no other movie laughing stock (has-been or otherwise) did before. He turned his career around completely with a single magnificent film. Gone Baby Gone shut down the mockery with one blow and proved Affleck one of the greats without even appearing on screen, but personalizing his directorial debut (not counting the obscure short I Killed My Lesbian Wife, Hung Her on a Meat Hook, and Now I Have a Three-Picture Deal at Disney from 1993. The film was so bad, Affleck disowned, so it seems just to discount it from his oeuvre) as if he had been an auteur for years. And perhaps, in a spiritual sense, he was, since Boston has long been so close to his heart.
            One is tempted to compare him to Clint Eastwood, who was not taken seriously until he took the director’s chair, but what Affleck offers in Gone Baby Gone, and would offer again in The Town, was something that no one, not even his early supporters, foresaw.
            From the opening shots of Gone Baby Gone, spanning the characteristic triple-decker homes of Dorchester, Affleck gives us the first honest unpolished window into a side of Boston only the locals know of. No, not even Good Will Hunting, for all its calculations and involvement of locals, peered this deeply. To be fair, such depths were not to be expected of Good Will Hunting, but no filmmaker has ever looked past Beacon Hill. New York has Martin Scorsese and Spike Lee as alternative to Woody Allen’s elegant vision of the city and Los Angeles has few movie idolizers, but no filmmaker has ever paid attention to the Boston neighborhoods for which Back Bay may as well be part of another city.
            Clint Eastwood took the first step with his excellent Mystic River (also from Dennis Lehane), exploring a hidden world of secret connections and dark secrets, but working-class life in Southie was scrubbed so clean it remained simply an acknowledgement of its existence rather than an exploration, though it was the first step toward a true exposure.          
            Affleck holds nothing back, as though the opening narration by his brother Casey (who took the lead as the detective who knows the block as well as anyone), were his own words (and they are, he wrote the screenplay with Aaron Stockard), sharing his reason for making the movie. He shows us all, the drug addictions, the hushed murders, and robberies that have left a mark in in the history of South Boston. But few outsiders ever see this world and it’s no surprise why. Southie and Dorchester are tight communities that don’t like to share much with strangers. Cops, detectives, and investigators are often told to mind their business and locals who talk to them aren’t easily forgiven. Is it any wonder that Mayor Menino’s attempt to run the “Stop Snitchin’” campaign out of town met with so much resistance? When little Amanda McCready (Madeline O’Brien) goes missing in this neighborhood, Patrick Kenzie (Casey Affleck), working as a private detective on the streets that raised him, knows how hard it will be to break the silence.
            The first scenes of Gone Baby Gone follow a familiar noir pattern. Patrick and Angie (Michelle Monaghan), his partner and lover, visit the local bars, talk to the local sleaze hounds, and irritate the neighborhood strong-arms who enforce the code of silence.
            Because our attention is not yet turned away to the deeper implications of the mystery, our attention is captivated entirely by Casey Affleck’s superb performance. Having stayed out of the mainstream for much of his early career, he largely dodged the tabloid vultures. But if there was a perfect way to break into the world his older brother occupies, this is it. It’s a tough, sensitive performance. Patrick knows the ways of the neighborhood, its rules and dangers, and many of its secrets. He’s been hardened by life in the block where he was raised, but finds reason to care about the residents who have been less fortunate than he. In South Boston, your neighbors are always your people, no matter what you become. No doubt, this sentiment hits home for the Affleck brothers.
            As the investigation widens, deeper elements come into play, ending the film with a morality question for which there can be no easy answers. Patrick makes a case for what he believes to be the right choice, but whether he did right by taking Amanda from a loving home and back into the arms of her neglectful mother with a seeming affinity for dangerous men because that was the legal thing to do can be endlessly debated.
            Gone Baby Gone offers no easy answers because morality in this neighborhood is relative and everyone who lives there has their own definition of it. Helene (Amy Ryan), Amanda’s addict mother, is who she is and shows little sign of changing up until we last see her. Still, her concern for Amanda seems sincere, even if she is not above compromising her to fulfill a drug deal. Amanda’s Aunt Bea (Amy Madigan) and Uncle Lionel (Titus Welliver) seem to genuinely love her, but her uncle’s resentment of his sister Helene takes precedent over Amanda’s safety. He claims to have done everything he is revealed to have done for her own good, but revenge seems that dominant motive.
            Detective Bressant, a bulldog investigator played by Ed Harris with a strong bite, joins the search and for most of the film we can forgive his hot-headedness and occasional overstepping of bounds because of his concern for children. His past, however, compromises him.
            He’s merciless when dispensing justice against child molesters, but his tactics aren’t always legal or ethical. But does that necessarily mean he is wrong? That’s one of the fundamental conflicts of Gone Baby Gone, what’s legal and what’s “right” and the irreconcilable differences between the two. Bressant’s answer to the charge “murder is always wrong” is, “depends who you do it to.”
            But who is Bressant’s judge? The only clue the movie drops our way is in the way Harris plays Bressant. There is something suspicious about the man from the start, as if he were harboring a deep anger toward a past experience, so much so that his vigilantism seems rooted in something deeper than justice (at least as he defines it) at any cost. It’s a shadow that hangs over Bressant until his final scene, so that his dying words “I love children,” only seem to account for a part of his motivation. More likely, his actions, as they become revealed, are a form of compensation for a past dark moment.
            Patrick has his own rule of thumb. “Shame is God’s way of telling you what you did was wrong,” he says. For everyone else, the answers aren’t so easily identified. The struggle between what’s right and what ‘s right and what’s just continue tugging at each other, becoming increasingly tense, until culminating in the final twist when Amanda is found alive and well living with Police Captain Jack Doyle (Morgan Freeman). It’s a twist not only in the common sense (one of the supposed good guys turns out to be a mole), but also a turn in the film’s direction. Up to then, Captain Doyle was the single beacon of morality in the film. Having lost a daughter himself to a killer, he made it his personal crusade to rescue lost children before it’s too late. He operates by the book and enforces protocol. But to what extent does he take his cause to rescue children? As far as kidnapping Amanda and taking her to his cabin by the lake.
            Affleck films Doyle’s cabin and its surroundings in idyllic natural beauty, tranquility, and bright natural colors; a stark contrast to the urban jungle seen through most of the film. It’s a great place to raise a child, away from noise, pollution, and crime. But is it legal? Well, no, but to understand why that would matter to Patrick is to understand his respect for his community. As unfit a mother as Helene is, Amanda is her kid and, as Helene’s neighbor, Patrick owes her the safe return of Amanda. But would Patrick have been wrong to let Amanda stay with the Doyles in a place where she was loved and cared for? It’s a complicated enough question and Affleck makes it harder by making a responsible and level-headed persona like Angie support that option. Patrick decides to go the other route and calls the cops on Doyle, cutting his relationship with Angie as a result. His choice was the legally correct one, but that’s hard to remember as we see Doyle’s wife in tears as the police pull Amanda from her arms; she is losing her second daughter.
            But Gone Baby Gone paints a world in which right and wrong have no visible boundaries. Some people do the wrong thing for right reasons, and others do wrong by trying to do right. There isn’t a way to satisfy everyone. Not surprisingly, those caught up in this endless shade of gray are law enforcement officials honoring their commitment to the community but also bound by the regulations of law. Take, for instance, Patrick’s impulse killing of a child molester when he finds a dead seven-year-old boy in his bathtub. He is haunted by his action almost immediately after. There is really no reason he should be except for the fact that it wasn’t the legal thing to do. His decision to call the police on Doyle was his way of making amends, by doing what was the legal thing to do. But, once more, did he do the wrong thing ethically to compensate for having done the right illegal thing?
            Given the difficulty in deciding what’s right, the easiest characters to trust are those operating outside of the law for their own purposes if only because there is never a question about where to stand with them. Cheese (Edi Gathegi) is a drug-dealing thug, simple as that, and the bar punks are little more than the neighborhood muscle. Maybe because their intentions and motivations are so obvious, they are easily manipulated and used by the alleged forces of good to accomplish their own ends. Cheese, for one, is essentially sacrificed after his use as a stooge runs its course.
            Gone Baby Gone is one of the best written thrillers of recent years, unfolding like a first-rate detective story with many unforgettable moments that verge between the comical and bizarrely creepy, something that may become Affleck’s signature after the ghastly nun-robbery in The Town. But the suspense and horror comes packaged with loaded questions, creating one of the decade’s most thought-provoking films. In a blink it turned reinvented Affleck’s career, pointing it in the right direction and was the second brought Casey Affleck, one of our finest actors, into the mainstream. Surprisingly, and this is something that even Affleck found astounding, the entire cast is in tune with the unseen side of Boston that only true Bostonians like the Affleck brothers know so well, except for Morgan Freeman who was likely cast simply because he is a great actor to cast in any role. But his detachment from his surroundings makes sense once we learn Doyle’s secret. To do what he did, Doyle had to think of Dorchester and the neighboring boroughs as a hopeless wasteland where no child can stand a chance for a good life. The question of Gone Baby Gone is not who Doyle is to make such a judgment but, rather, is he right in doing what he does about it.  

Sunday, July 6, 2014

SHAKESPEARE IN LOVE


           Shakespeare in Love is a flower of a movie, brimming with the lively poetic vibrations of Shakespeare himself. It never takes itself more seriously than it should, but makes the heart smile just the same. It’s just as well that it centers on an imaginary story behind the writing of Romeo & Juliet, a tragedy conceptualized as a comedy.
            It’s a lovely film and, yet, is produced as a celebration of theater. There is very little of the actual plays shown, but the whole movie feels like an elaborate stage production. For once, noticing the signs of production craft is part of the charm. The mock-up of the Rose Theater was such a thing of beauty that Judi Dench (playing Queen Elizabeth here as in 1998’s other hit Elizabeth) adopted the set with the hopes of turning it into a working stage. The role of Viola de Lesseps, the nobleman’s daughter disguised as a man as a way to enter the stage and ends up becoming the muse of Shakespeare himself, went to the then rising star Gwyneth Paltrow (after Kate Winslet turned it down and plans with Julia Roberts fell through), the LA blonde who was already building esteem for her portrayal of an English literary icon in Emma. Her natural take to Anglo parts (ironically, the adaptation of Great Expectations where she appeared alongside Ethan Hawke shifted local from London to the Florida swamps) only solidified with her move to England. Ben Affleck, his appearance a token of good faith with Miramax the studio where he got the start with Good Will Hunting the previous year, is harder to take seriously as thespian ham Ned Alleyn.
But Shakespeare in Love never asks to be taken seriously. It’s certainly doesn’t make any claims on accuracy or even a serious expose about William Shakespeare, though it does play with the often forgotten fact that a number of his sonnets (including some quoted in the film) were, in fact, written for a man, all 154 of them dedicated to a Mr. W.H., believed to be Henry Wriothesley, 3rd Earl of Southampton. The movie doesn’t stress that Shakespeare may have been bisexual, as some historians have recently speculated. Viola first catches his eye, after all, in her natural feminine state at a ball in her father’s palace on the other side of the Thames. But when she auditions for his Romeo and Ethel, the Pirate’s Daughter (the play’s working title) as one Thomas Kent sporting a bushy moustache and a vagabond suit, she sparks something in him. Make of that what you will.
Shakespeare in Love is simply a feathery flight of fantasy, a charming bit of whimsy of the sort Shakespeare would have admired. The speculation, whatever truth there is to it, is not outrageous. Shakespeare composed Romeo and Juliet while essentially living like its two star-crossed lovers. Shakespeare, a struggling romantic with a wandering heart in 1593, falls for a woman of wealth on the other side of the river. Viola is out of his reach not only in a financial sense but is bound through custom to marry Lord Wessex (Colin Firth), a pompous over-dressed plantation owner. This romance may not quite end in the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, but makes for a bittersweet parting nonetheless. Dowry customs cannot be easily broken, not even by the Queen, and Viola sets off for the New World with her husband. Although the clearest shadow of her memory in the Shakespeare canon is, of course, Twelfth Night, the movie ends with Shakespeare remembering her first and foremost as the woman who inspired Romeo and Juliet, his most famous work, his love for Viola as impossible and dangerous as a love between a Montague and a Capulet.
Shakespeare in Love would not have been made without a love for Shakespeare and his work. It’s a different loving form of fan fiction brightened by an intelligent understanding not only of the writer’s canon but of Elizabethan theater as well. Director John Madden took this appreciation and, without changing time and place, made it accessible to the 90s, similarly (in part, at least) to what Baz Luhrmann did in William Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet.  
But Madden has something that Luhrmann lacked, a great cast of character actors behind the leads of the sort Shakespeare himself would have found funny. Geoffrey Rush almost steals the show as Henslowe, the uppity owner of the struggling Rose Theater, who lives in fear of burly financier Fennyman (Tom Wilkinson doing what he does best, playing a sadist in a gentleman’s suit), who starts out as an imposing menace, but turns into an oafish romantic when offered a part in the play. Simon Callow is seen all too little, but does have moments of glory as Edmund Tilney, the rowdy courtier to the Queen, and Rupert Everett makes for a likeable Christopher Marlowe, whose demise here could be best described as a comedy of errors.
There is even a nod to John Webster and the dark playwright he was to become. He is seen here as a young street urchin played by Joe Roberts with a love for brutality and the grotesque. He befriends mice to lure them into his clutches and then feeds them live to stray cats. His vindictive nature after Shakespeare scorns him suggests that, had he been old enough at the time, he would have been as serious a rival to Shakespeare as Marlowe and Cervantes.
The crown jewel, however, is Judi Dench as the saucy Elizabeth I. Her tone is just right for Madden’s take, never taking the Queen’s eccentricities too seriously, even allowing Her Majesty to loosen up and share the laughs.
Shakespeare in Love is an impeccably balanced film and a triumph of expert casting. As much as one is tempted to dispute its Best Picture win over Saving Private Ryan, there is no doubt it’s one of the best films of 1998. Madden's success at making Shakespeare cool for Generation X-ers ensured an audience for the following year's 10 Things I Hate About You, a burlesque of The Taming of the Shrew set in a contemporary preppy high school in California. Its acclaim didn’t come without a price, however, albeit one that quickly and quietly dissolved. Six days before the Academy Awards in 1999, American novelist Faye Kellerman filed a suit in the US District Court against Miramax, Universal City, and screenwriters Marc Norman and Tom Stoppard, claiming that the screenplay (then a contender for Best Original Screenplay, an award it would eventually win) was ripped off of her 1989 novel The Quality of Mercy in which a young Shakespeare falls in love with Rebecca Lopez, a young Jewish woman who masquerades as a man. The similarities are superficial, however. Beyond the cross-dressing, Kellerman’s novel goes in an entirely different direction than the movie, dealing with a murder mystery and the Spanish Inquisition. As Miramax spokesman Andrew Stengel said, “The two stories are so different that the idea that one was copied from the other is absurd.”
The controversy went away without a whimper, leading credence to Stengel’s assessment that the lawsuit was a mere publicity stunt. In truth, writers and artists have long tried to imagine the inspiration behind Shakespeare’s masterworks and the mysteries of his heart. Perhaps this is because the best of them, like Romeo and Juliet touch on so many of our fundamentally human elements such as love, sacrifice, passion, tragedy, and laughter. We will never likely find a way to explain the genius behind William Shakespeare, but Madden has a wonderful time trying.