By
the time he was arrested in 1969, Frank Abagnale Jr., had stolen close to $3
million in fraudulent checks, making him one of the richest conmen under the
age of 30 up to that point. During his sentence he used his eye for phony
checks to help the FBI, especially Carl Hanratty, the agent leading his arrest,
catch fakes. After his sentence ended his talent became a career which brought
him even more millions than he had stolen. That says more about justice than
Abagnale’s character but the story, published in 1980 as a book written by
Abagnale himself, is full of the sour irony Hollywood loves. Sure enough,
Abagnale sold the film rights before a year could pass since publication. But
the project stayed on back burner for almost twenty years. It wasn’t until
1990, in fact, that Michael Shane first optioned the book but soon tossed it
back to the storeroom as he went on to develop Magellan Filmed Entertainment.
There it remained until 1997 when Paramount’s Bungalow 78 Prods came along with
screenwriter Jeff Nathanson and offered to co-produce an adaptation, taking it
to DreamWorks, where it attracted Leonardo DiCaprio for the role of Abagnale by
the summer of 2000. At the time the forerunners for director were Gore
Verbinski and David Fincher.
At the time, the studio’s priority
was to begin production before anticipated strikes by the Screen Actors Guild
and Writers Guild in the early summer of 2001. By July of that year, however,
threats of the strikes amounted to nothing, Verbinski had backed down from production
in late 2000 fearing he would be unable to start shooting in time after
DiCaprio’s stay in Rome became prolonged when filming for Martin Scorsese’s Gangs of New York met with delays. When Lasse Hallstrom backed down in the summer
of 2001, Steven Spielberg was beginning to look like a viable option, though
his heart was set on Big Fish and Memories of a Geisha.
“This movie wasn't even on my radar
until, you know, the product was purchased,” Spielberg said. “I didn't even
know the history of the project, didn't know this incredible journey the
project had taken. I didn't realize that Frank had actually bought and sold his
book four times. I mean, which is very Frank. But, I didn't realize any of this
until we were in production on the screenplay that Walter Parkes supervised.”
Spielberg was soon taken by Abagnale’s
story, however, remarking, “I was like the many people who fell under the
seductive influence of the real Frank William Abagnale, Jr., just through his
book. And when you meet him, you understand in a second how he could pull the
wool over your eyes and convince you that he was a doctor or a lawyer. I was
fascinated by the unique way he came of age. I really believe he was very
strongly affected by the divorce of his parents. There are all sorts of ways
kids act out against divorce, and Frank just happened to act out in a way that
was so original, it was worth making a movie about. Personally, I have always
loved movies about sensational rogues, like the Newman/Redford classics Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and The Sting. They were breaking the law,
but you had to love them for their moxie. "
Were it not for the presence of Tom
Hanks and Leonardo DiCaprio as the relatively well-mannered cat and mouse, Catch Me if You Can would hardly garner
a whisper in any overview of Spielberg’s body of work, so few of the director’s
hallmarks being present and the magic relegated to a scant few moments. It
works, but unexcitedly so, much like clockwork. If it’s worth anything it’s for
the innovative things it does with DiCaprio and Hanks.
Carl Hanratty is a plum role for
Hanks and he captures the dour agent’s stiffness with a good eye for
eccentricities as well as sense of fair play. The movie, unfortunately, gives
Hanks little space to expand with what he is capable of, but the seed of a
compelling performance is ever present. Perhaps, though, Hanratty is best
played as a tough oddball to read, the mystery surrounding the workings of his
mind only adds to his mystique. There is something brewing beneath that
reptilian shell. He is humorless, but not boring and clearly invigorated by the
challenges of the chase. Abagnale is his Professor Moriarty; the criminal who
can finally outsmart him. Without him, Hanratty hungers stimulation. When not
occupied with a worthy foe, Sherlock Holmes turned to cocaine. Chinese take-out
is Hanratty’s drug of choice. Moriarty almost killed Holmes (indeed, that was
Doyle’s intention for “The Final Problem” until fans demanded otherwise) but,
nonetheless, was Holmes’s most formidable opponent, often complimenting the
sleuth for his mastermind and allowing him to write a farewell letter to his
friend Watson. Holmes missed the old criminal after he fell to his death from
Reichenbach Falls, now lacking an adversary worthy of his genius. Likewise,
Hanratty is impressed by Abagnale’s intelligence, certainly the slickest
teenager he has chased. Hanks recognized Hanratty’s ego as the primary driving
force.
“Carl Hanratty loves that stuff; he lives
and breathes it. So when he comes across this paperhanger, as they're called,
who is remarkably intelligent and certainly an above-average check forger, Carl
makes it his life's mission to, well, catch him if he can,” he said.
Take the first time Hanratty meets
Abagnale. Hanratty has tracked him to a hotel, but by the time he breaks down
the door to his suite, Abagnale has now taken on the identity of a Secret
Service agent, also investigating the fraudulent checks. Hanratty buys the
story and lets him go only to discover he’s been duped once Abagnale has
escaped. He is frustrated and humiliated, but not without a hint of amusement.
Hanks explained further, “Carl is so
impressed with the style and panache of his quarry that he's doubly astounded
to discover how young he is. Carl suddenly realizes that he is just a kid,
incredibly gifted but ultimately a child, who is in the midst of an adventure that
is bigger than he is. Carl comes to feel almost protective of Frank. I mean, he
treats him like a criminal-he's going to arrest him and send him to jail-but at
the end of the day, he sees a fragile human being who is worth trying to redeem
somehow.”
“Carl Hanratty eventually becomes
the only person who Frank Abagnale trusts, which is ironic given the fact that
Carl is the one who is aggressively trying to put him in jail. There is a
certain element of Carl becoming something of a father figure to Frank because
he ends up being the only real guidance that my character has,” DiCaprio added.
Abagnale, in turn, plays as fairly
as he can with Hanratty and resents embarrassing him. From the start the
relationship seems destined to end in partnership if not friendship. Catch Me if You Can is, after all, a
vehicle for Leonardo DiCaprio and the film can’t afford to make him despicable.
He takes a sympathetic approach to Frank Abagnale and makes him a charismatic
fake with a broken childhood. The film wouldn’t work otherwise, and DiCaprio can
play vulnerable rogues as good as anyone. For the film’s purpose of asking the
audience to be merciful in our judgment of Frank Abagnale as well as
demonstrating just how he got away with so much for so long, the casting of
DiCaprio could not possibly go wrong. Who else could charm his way through
flight stewardesses, pretty young bank tellers, and the shy rich girl played by
Amy Adams? And, at the same time, who else could bring such sensibilities to a
man who made millions as a fake?
The best moments in Catch Me if You Can involve Abagnale’s
relationship with his father (Christopher Walken), a man who also tried to fast-talking
his way through life, but never explored the option of dishonesty and as a
result lost his business and his wife, inadvertedly leaving his son with one
lesson, honesty will get you nowhere.
The significance of Frank Abagnale
Sr. to his son was best described by producer Walter F. Parkes, who recommended
Walken for the part. “The key person in Frank's life was his father,” he said.
“In our film he is a kind of modern Willie Loman. He's an extremely charismatic
man whose attempts to grab onto the American dream elude him every time. There
is great poignancy in that.”
There is much to learn about Abagnale from
the Abagnale household, but Spielberg decides not to dig deep. He goes out of
his way to keep the tone fluffy and fleeting, which is fine as far as it goes.
He made clear his intention to go for lighter fare. But he tries to have it
both ways, amusing us with Abagnale’s escapades while trying to make us want to
hug him. But Spielberg never realizes the need to slow down and give the
audience a chance to reflect on Abagnale and what made him who he is if he
wants a heart to the picture.
Parkes stressed how difficult it was to
find the right tone, “What was both exciting and tricky about Catch Me if You Can was that it falls
between several genres,” he said. “There are times of searing drama, but at its
heart, it is more of a comedy. So it was a challenge, both in the writing and
in the execution of the movie, to somehow encompass all of those facets.”
Spielberg found the humor, but not
the heart. One scene in particular reflects how inadequate his speed is for the
sentiments he wants. Late in both the movie and in his criminal career, a
sickly and saddened Abagnale, with the FBI in close pursuit, staggers over to
his childhood home where his mother has remarried and built a new life after
his father’s death. Abagnale is now a destroyed man, robbed of the only man he ever
trusted, his health poor, and no escape left (both literally and figuratively).
A frosty window separates this forlorn figure from the festivities of Christmas
inside the house. Indeed, the world within, of opulent Christmas trees, holiday
music, and Christmas joys is a world he can no longer return to, so much so
that his mother never even notices him outside. It’s the film’s most potent
moment, but Spielberg is too hurried to let the inherent heartbreak to sink in.
He makes his point and runs off before it penetrates.
That he misses the human factor is a
pity but Spielberg’s intention from the moment Catch Me if You Can landed on his lap was to take a break and have
fun.
“I had just finished shooting Minority Report and was in something of
a dark place,” the director explained. “I thought this would be a breath of
fresh air for me. I enjoy that whiplash sensation of going from a film like Jurassic Park to a Schindler’s List and now from Minority
Report to Catch Me if You Can.”
To
that end the movie is a modest success, thanks largely to the two fun lead
performances and a delightfully intimidating Martin Sheen as Amy Adams’s
bullying rich daddy.
“Martin brought an immediate power and
solidity to the role,” Parkes said. “He has that kind of intimidating presence,
which is very important in that it gives Frank a certain amount of anxiety to
deal with.”
Finally,
the period recreations never become a distraction.
“This was the age of the jet set,”
observed Hanks. “Literally, you could get on a jet plane and be on the other
side of the world in a matter of hours. For my generation, it was the height of
glamour: colors looked cooler and everything was very bold and stylish.”
To capture both the essence of the era and
the bouncier tone of the film, Spielberg made greater use of lighting than is
customary and even instructed John Williams to tone down his soundtrack.
“John did something he's never done before,”
Spielberg later said. “He wrote music in the idiom of progressive jazz, which
was very popular in the 1950s and '60s.”
“In my past work with Steven, we have had
large orchestras and broad themes,” Williams recalled. “But on this particular
film, we don't have that kind of canvas. It's more intricate. The story is
light and amusing, but is also about a serious subject, so the music had to
have different shades. It's comedic one moment, and then tense as the FBI
closes in on Frank. One particular figure who I think dominated the American
film music scene in the 1960s was Henry Mancini. He typified the best of that
stylish, jazzy approach to films that we now associate with that period so
nostalgically. I actually was the pianist in Henry Mancini's orchestra at the
beginning of both of our careers. I played on the Peter Gunn recordings and on Breakfast at Tiffany’s and was very
close to him personally, as well as musically.”
Despite his avowed comfort in the 40s, Spielberg
does a fine job of the 60s, its sounds, colors, though his heart seems to be
less involved here than his true passion projects, a sad result of the manner
in which the project was forced into his hands. All things considered, however,
he pulls off a commendable effort for what was almost certainly an unexpected
interruption in his schedule no matter how taken in he was by Abagnale’s
escapades. His approach to Catch Me if
You Can is uninspired but the end result is not unpleasant, a rare
circumstance indeed. It’s a Spielberg time-filler, no more no less.
Another great analysis of one of Spielberg's smaller efforts. The Hanks -DiCaprio pairing is certainly the most interesting element of this film. I would also group this with The Terminal for both the Hanks star role and the tone.
ReplyDelete